Among Case TR340 vs. Bobcat T770: Which is best?
7 Min read
&w=3840&q=75)
July 26, 2023
When choosing between the Case TR340 and the Bobcat T770, it's important to consider their specifications, features, and overall performance to determine which machine best suits your needs. Here's a detailed comparison to help you decide:
CASE TR340 vs. Bobcat T770: Key Differences
The CASE TR340 and Bobcat T770 are heavy-duty compact track loaders built for demanding construction and material-handling tasks. The Bobcat offers slightly higher horsepower and a higher published tipping load, while the CASE provides slightly greater auxiliary hydraulic flow. The best choice depends on lifting needs, attachments, jobsite conditions, and operating costs.
Related Equipment
Browse all Excavators
%3Aformat(webp)&w=1920&q=75)
Detailed Comparison
Performance
The Bobcat T770 has a slight edge in engine power, with 92 hp compared to the 90 hp of the Case TR340. This difference, though minor, can contribute to slightly better performance in demanding tasks. Both machines have similar rated operating capacities and tipping loads, making them comparable in terms of lifting and carrying capabilities.
Weight and Size
The Case TR340 is slightly lighter, with an operating weight of 10,000 lbs compared to the Bobcat T770's 10,515 lbs. Both machines have similar dimensions and travel speeds, offering good maneuverability and ease of transport.
Hydraulics
The Case TR340 offers higher hydraulic flow rates both in standard and high-flow modes. This can provide better performance when using hydraulic attachments, making the Case TR340 more versatile for various tasks that require strong hydraulic power.
Ground Pressure
The Bobcat T770 has a lower ground pressure of 4.2 psi compared to the Case TR340's 5.0 psi. Lower ground pressure is beneficial when working on soft or sensitive surfaces, as it reduces the risk of ground damage and improves stability.
Fuel Efficiency
The Bobcat T770 has a slightly larger fuel tank capacity of 27.2 gallons compared to the 25.5 gallons of the Case TR340. This allows for longer operating hours without refueling, potentially increasing productivity on larger job sites.
Pricing
Prices for these machines can vary based on the year, configuration, and additional features. As of the most recent data, new Case TR340 models typically range from $60,000 to $75,000, while new Bobcat T770 models range from $70,000 to $85,000 (Construction Equipment Guide) (Machinery Pete).
Choosing between the Case TR340 and the Bobcat T770 will depend on your specific needs and priorities:
Case TR340: Higher hydraulic flow rates make it ideal for tasks requiring powerful hydraulic attachments. Slightly lighter and potentially more versatile in certain applications.
Bobcat T770: Slightly more powerful engine, lower ground pressure, and a larger fuel tank make it well-suited for extended use on softer surfaces and larger job sites.
Both machines offer excellent performance and reliability, making them suitable choices for various construction and landscaping tasks.
Hydraulic Performance and Attachment Compatibility
%3Aformat(webp)&w=1920&q=75)
Hydraulic flow affects how effectively a compact track loader operates attachments such as mulchers, trenchers, cold planers, and hydraulic breakers.
The CASE TR340 provides 24.2 gpm of standard auxiliary flow, with an optional high-flow rate of 37.6 gpm. The Bobcat T770 offers 23 gpm standard flow and 36.6 gpm high flow in its published specifications.
CASE therefore has a slight published flow advantage in these configurations. However, attachment performance also depends on hydraulic pressure, cooling capacity, and the attachment manufacturer's requirements.
Before purchasing either machine, check the required flow and pressure for your intended attachments. A properly matched hydraulic system can improve productivity and help prevent unnecessary equipment limitations.
Radial Lift Geometry and Jobsite Applications
Both the CASE TR340 and Bobcat T770 use radial lift geometry. This lift-arm design provides strong digging and breakout performance, making it suitable for ground-level excavation, grading, and pushing applications.
Related Equipment
Browse all Excavators
Radial-lift machines are often selected for earthmoving and construction work where digging performance is important. Contractors should also evaluate dump height, reach at maximum height, bucket capacity, and attachment compatibility.
When comparing these loaders, consider the material being handled and the height at which it needs to be placed. Matching lift geometry to the job can improve efficiency and reduce unnecessary machine movement.
Which Is Better: CASE TR340 or Bobcat T770?
The CASE TR340 and Bobcat T770 are both capable compact track loaders, but the better choice depends on the work being performed.
The CASE TR340 is worth considering for contractors who prioritize its published auxiliary hydraulic flow, radial-lift performance, and compatibility with demanding attachments. Its high-flow options make it a practical candidate for applications requiring hydraulic power.
The Bobcat T770 offers 92 horsepower and a higher published tipping load in the referenced specifications. It may appeal to buyers who prioritize lifting capacity and the Bobcat attachment ecosystem.
Before deciding, compare rated operating capacity using the same measurement standard, hydraulic requirements, machine condition, and maintenance history. The best loader is the one that meets your job requirements while delivering dependable long-term value.
What to Inspect Before Buying a Used CASE TR340 or Bobcat T770
Before purchasing a used compact track loader, inspect its mechanical condition and operating performance carefully.
Engine: Check for unusual noises, smoke, oil leaks, and overheating.
Hydraulic system: Inspect pumps, hoses, cylinders, and connections for leaks or damage.
Tracks: Examine rubber tracks for cracks, missing sections, and uneven wear.
Rollers and sprockets: Check for excessive wear and damaged components.
Lift arms: Look for cracks, weld repairs, and structural damage.
Attachment coupler: Verify locking operation and attachment compatibility.
Controls: Test steering, loader functions, auxiliary hydraulics, and safety interlocks.
Cooling system: Inspect the radiator, hydraulic cooler, and cooling fans.
Service records: Review maintenance history, repair invoices, and available oil-analysis reports.
Operating hours: Compare the hour meter with service records and the machine's overall condition.
A professional inspection and operational test can help identify potential repair costs before purchasing used equipment.
Expert Insights for Comparing Compact Track Loaders
Choosing between the CASE TR340 and Bobcat T770 requires more than comparing horsepower and lifting capacity. Buyers should evaluate rated operating capacity, hydraulic performance, lift geometry, ground pressure, maintenance history, and attachment compatibility. Boom & Bucket encourages equipment buyers to verify manufacturer specifications and inspect machine condition before investing in used compact track loaders.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much horsepower does the CASE TR340 have?
The CASE TR340 produces 90 gross horsepower and 84 net horsepower according to its published specifications.
How much horsepower does the Bobcat T770 have?
The Bobcat T770 is rated at 92 horsepower in the manufacturer's published specifications.
Which machine has a higher rated operating capacity?
The Bobcat T770 has higher published capacity figures in the referenced specifications, but buyers must compare the same rating standard and configuration.
Which compact track loader has better hydraulic flow?
The CASE TR340 lists 24.2 gpm standard flow and 37.6 gpm high flow, compared with the Bobcat T770's 23 gpm standard and 36.6 gpm high flow in the cited specifications.
Are the CASE TR340 and Bobcat T770 suitable for heavy-duty attachments?
Both offer high-flow hydraulic options for compatible attachments. Buyers should verify the required hydraulic flow and pressure before selecting a machine.
What should I inspect before buying a used compact track loader?
Check the engine, hydraulic system, tracks, rollers, sprockets, lift arms, attachment coupler, controls, and service history. A professional inspection is recommended.
Looking for a Reliable Used Compact Track Loader?
Whether you prefer the CASE TR340 or Bobcat T770, choosing the right machine starts with comparing lifting capacity, hydraulic performance, condition, and operating costs.
Explore used compact track loaders at Boom & Bucket to find equipment that matches your project requirements and budget.
Browse available compact track loaders today and find the right machine for you
Samir Shah is the Co-Founder and Chief Product Officer of Boom & Bucket, where he leads the development of innovative solutions for buying and selling heavy equipment. With a background in engineering, product development, and business strategy, Samir has a track record of taking companies from concept to market success. Previously, he was the Head of Cat Digital Labs at Caterpillar, overseeing digital initiatives and product launches. He holds degrees from MIT Sloan and Carnegie Mellon, and he is passionate about tackling big challenges in underserved industries.
